Traditional Church of England in Ashford
“That even now, while we are placed among things that are passing away; to cleave to those which shall abide”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The
following is taken from the Ashford Borough Council Planning
Application website, but here it is set out in what we consider to be a
more user friendly and readable format with attachments included in the
document as you read (Click on the underlined links in the Appendix to
see the files in pdf format)
PLANNING APPLICATION FORM DETAILING VESTRY CONVERSION - Please read & follow instructions to object to works BY 8TH AUGUST.
DESIGN
& ACCESS STATEMENT FOR NEW TOILET EXTENSIONS
ST MARY THE
VIRGIN, ASHFORD
FOR
ST MARY THE VIRGIN PCC
BY LEE EVANS
PARTNERSHIP REF NO: 6792
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 For centuries St
Mary's Church has served as the centre for religious,
communal,
and cultural life in the Ashford. The PCC have seen a broadening
use
of the church at the heart of St Mary's vision and working with
Ashford
Borough Council have been pursuing a re-ordering project
for the Church in
the heart of Ashford. Submissions have been made
to the Diocese Advisory
Committee in preparation for the Faculty
Application and this Planning
Application. The DAC's advice has
been taken and the Project Team has
now been encouraged to submit
the Detailed Applications - see attached
minute of the DAC
(Appendix 1). As part of the re-ordering scheme it is
proposed to
put a small extension behind the current vestry, and convert
the
existing organ blower room to provide toilets. As the church
use for
performances increases there is need for rooms where
artists can change
and it is proposed to slightly modify the
furniture in the vestries so they can
double up as "green
rooms" for the performers when they are not used by the
choir
and clergy.
1.2 Ashford Council has identified the need for a
cultural centre in the heart of the
town where performances can
take place by visiting artists as well as visual
art exhibitions.
They have identified St Mary's Church as having the potential
to
expand and facilitate these activities within the existing church
with minor
modifications to the building. The Local Authority and
the Church Authorities
have therefore decided to develop St Mary's
as a cultural centre in Ashford.
As the town expands, other venues
may come forward, but for the
foreseeable future St Mary's can
provide a solution to the demand in the
locality with some minor
alterations to the fabric of the Church. These
alterations will
also help facilitate the renewal and restoration of the Church
and
the development of the Church's own work within the
community.
Consultations
1.3 Prior to preparing this Planning
Application and the application to the Church
Authorities a series
of consultations have taken place both with the Church
and
Community. They consultations have been taking place over a two
year
period and include two public exhibitions, as well as
consultations with
statutory amenity societies. The bodies that
have been consulted are:-
- Ashford Council Conservation
Department
- English Heritage
- The Society for Preservation of
Ancient Buildings
- The Georgian Group
- The Victorian
Society
- The Diocese Advisory Committee of Canterbury
Diocese.
Whilst some have expressed reservations about some
aspects of the
proposals, no-one has objected to the scheme in
principle. The Victorian
Society have concerns about the loss of
pews and the moving of the pulpit
but they have made no comments
on the proposed extension to the organ
blower room. Attached to
this report are the consultation letters (Appendix 2).
The Need
for The Extension
1.4 Attached to this document is a Statement of
the Need from the Church
(Appendix 3) for the whole project as
well as a report from Shea Debnam
Associates produced for Ashford
Council as part of the business plan
detailing the expected
programme for the next two years. Already the Church
is used for a
significant number of concerts which the Council help promote
and
it is hoped that in the early years of the collaboration there will
be at least
five seasons a year of performances (typically up to 3
days) but this could
build up to as much as 15 seasons a year from
national and international
artists. The emphasis will probably be
on musical activities, but it is hoped to
encourage theatrical
performances from small scale touring companies as
well. In
addition to these major seasons, there is a clear local demand
for
large scale events from groups such local choirs, music
groups, schools and
the Ashford Youth Theatre. As well as live
literature events for national and
local poets, writers and
speakers.
At present, performers do change in the vestries rooms
but there are no
toilets and only one small basin, and this is
totally unsatisfactory for the level
of activity that the Church
is expecting to house now and in the future. A
dedicated theatre
would have a series of toilets for artists to use, but given
the
historic nature of the Church and the limited activity, the minimum
we feel
is acceptable in terms of additional toilet accommodation
to serve the vestries
is two toilets.
The studies have shown
the need to accommodate up to 12-14 performers
changing. We
believe that 2 toilets is therefore a minimal provision which
would
be acceptable to visiting companies for the quality of the project
they
are trying to attract. The size of existing vestries is only
just large enough to
accommodate this many people changing and
therefore including the toilets
within the rooms has been
discounted.
We believe the adequate provision of toilets is
important and inadequate
provision would hamper the development of
St Mary's as an attractive venue
for national and international
artists.
The proposed scheme would provide these by converting the
existing organ
blower room into one WC and extending it in small
gap behind it back towards
the north wall of the Chancel to
provide the other toilet. The existing organ
blower would be
lifted up into the roofspace and a new dormer with louvres
provided
to ventilate that space and gain access.
The blower would be
mounted at roof level over the toilets and connect into
the
existing ducts. It would be accessed via a new oak louvered dormer
clad
in lead.
Other Options Considered
1.5 The only other
option considered was to include these toilets within the
vestry
space but given the need for storage for the existing choir
and clergy, these
two rooms are not overly large. The existing
choir can be up to a dozen or
more in size and the Vicar can be
supported by other clergy and three or four
Servers. Therefore we
have concluded there is not sufficient space within
these rooms to
accommodate the additional toilets.
Artificial and Historical
Significance of the Proposals
1.6 Attached to this document is a
copy of the Architectural History Practice's
Statement of
Significance for St Mary's Church. This details of the
significance
historically and architectural significance of the whole building
has
been considered and it identifies the vestries as one of the latest
parts of
the building. The vestry was built in 1873 and the
architect is unknown.
Originally it would have been a single
storey room but it was divided in 1927
to the designs of Philip
Richard Day. The blower room itself we think was built
around the
same time. The Statement of Significance does identify a fine set
of
cupboards in an old doorway which led out into the space where we
are
proposing to undertake the extension (though there is no
visible doorway on
the outside). These cupboards we feel are of
significance and we have
decided to keep and instead put the
doorway though the middle fireplace area
out into the organ
blower. There is an existing very large nineteenth century
radiator
in the fireplace which would need to be moved. We also feel that
the
insertion of this radiator has already altered the
configuration in this area and
we therefore believe this is the
least significant part of the wall to make a new
opening however
there may be the remnants of a fireplace behind it which will
be
revealed when we open up the area and remove the later cupboards.
1.7
Consultations with the SPAB have suggested that the north wall of
the
Chancel is medieval and should be left exposed so it can
'breathe'. There is
an existing lead downpipe in the corner where
the extension is proposed and
we will need to modify this down
pipe so it comes down onto the new lead flat
roof over the new
extension toilet, and then install a new cast iron downpipe
in the
corner to meet the existing drain run.
2. ECOLOGY
2.1 The area
of the proposed extension is of virtually no ecological value,
having
been used as a dumping ground with only sparse grass
growing in the area.
2.2 The Church does have a colony of bats
residing within the main area and we
are undertaking a Bat Survey
for this and the Blower Room currently, which
will be available
before the end of the planning process.
3. MATERIALS
3.1 It is
proposed to face the external wall of the new extension in rag stone
to
match the existing building and cover the roof with a shallow
sloping lead
roof.
4. ARCHAEOLOGY
4.1 Working in an ancient
churchyard, there is always chance of archaeology,
however; with
the close proximity to the foundations of the early
twentiethcentury
blower room and the nineteenth-century vestries
together with the
drain run crossing the area of the proposed
extension this small area is likely
to have been disturbed in the
past and we are not expecting to find a lot of
archaeology in
tack. An early photograph shows graves where the blower
room is
now sited but it is assumed these were moved. However to minimise
the
risk to any remaining archaeology we are proposing that the extension
is
built of a raft foundation. As part of the Faculty consent we
are proposing that
there will be an archaeological watching brief
over the whole of any works in
the ground or opening up which
would cover this area as well.

Photograph of the vestry from 1900
before the blower room was built.
(Actually this is incorrect - the clock face shown dates the picture to pre 1890's)
5. DRAINAGE
5.1 The extension
is a very small extension to the building and would have
no
significant effect on Flood Risk in the immediate areas. There
is an existing
combined drainage system in places around most of
the church but we are
not sure how the drainage system works in
the area of the proposed
extension although we expect the existing
downpipe in the corner of the
vestry wall and chancel wall goes to
a soakaway. We therefore propose to
install a new drainage system
leading up to the existing public foul drain by
running it round
the vestry building and up the existing path to the north of
the
church. It is felt that with this drain run we would be able
to avoid the most
obvious graves and an archaeological watching
brief would be undertaken
whilst the drain runs manholes were
laid.
6. CONCLUSIONS
The proposed new toilet extension is
needed to provide sufficient provision of
toilets in the right
location to serve the vestries and green rooms.
We believe the
adequate provision of these toilets is important and
inadequate
provision would hamper the development of St Mary's as an
attractive
venue for national and international artists.
The extension is
also very modest and in one of the least visible parts of the
church
of the overall scheme for the re-ordering and use of the Church as
a
performance venue. This use is in line with the Anglican
Church's desire to
facilitate community uses in their churches and
it also is in line with English
Heritage's encouragement to make
use of church buildings for community
uses and we believe this
alteration is a very modest proposal to one of the
least
significant parts of the Church's fabric.
LEE EVANS
PARTNERSHIP
(Click on links below)
APPENDIX 1 DAC MINUTES
APPENDIX 2
CONSULTATION LETTERS:
VICTORIAN SOCIETY LETTER
SPAB LETTER
APPENDIX 3 STATEMENT OF NEED:
The re-ordering will offer the opportunity to enhance and
increase
activities, providing an upgraded, well-appointed,
flexible multi-use and
shared space in the body of the nave,
suitable for hosting a wide range
of religious, arts and community
programming1.
St Mary's has served as a hub for religious,
communal and cultural life in Ashford for
many centuries. The PCC
sees the broader use of the church as being at the heart of
St
Mary's ministry and mission to the town. As Ashford is now
experiencing a period
of growth that will see the town's
population double by 2031, St Mary's location at the
centre of the
original town is a natural place to develop much needed community
and
arts infrastructure for urban Ashford.
A re-ordered St
Mary's will fundamentally serve to better reflect and
accommodate
contemporary forms of worship and to more effectively
support the PCC's towncentre
outreach. The church building in its
current configuration and state of repair
cannot sustain any
further congregation growth at communion and monthly family
services.
It cannot safely and comfortably accommodate larger events such
as
school services, Christingle, baptisms and funerals for 300
people or more. This is a
significant hindrance to the PCC's
mission and ministry and effects the sustainable
future of the
building, to provide streams of income to assist in the conservation
and
enhancement of the Church's historic fabric.
A key growth
priority is to address the current lack of community space and
facilities
for performing and visual arts within the Ashford urban
area. Located at the historic
heart of the town, St Mary's can
play a key role in this cultural transformation of
Ashford by
increasing the longstanding and successful arts use of the church2.
The
development of an arts programme at St Mary's has been
similarly hampered by
poor lighting, sound, seating, staging and
backstage facilities and the overall
flexibility of the
space.
There is a high degree of convergence between the planned
re-ordering of the
church to meet the needs of local arts and
community groups and the delivery of the
PCC's ministry and
mission, in terms of rehearsing and presenting their work
to
audiences and attenders3. In particular, to be better able to
present stage/dias-based
activities including liturgical dance,
live music (including lunchtime concerts), poetry
readings, drama
and multimedia presentations to larger seated audiences. The
reordering
supports the need for flexibility to reconfigure the
seating to provide more
intimate settings for reflection,
mediation, talks, prayer meetings, forums, retreats and
exhibitions
of religious art.
The philosophy of a 'shared space' has been
adopted by the PCC and its partners.
Research, consultation and
development work with key stakeholders and potential
arts and
community users indicated that in the first instance, the future
arts
programme
would best operate alongside St Mary's use as a place of worship,
under
three hiring strands which will be discreet but will seek to
be complimentary4. These
comprise:
1. The Music Programme - a
high quality programme developed and delivered
by an independent
professional music promoter. This offers the opportunity
for
developing a reputation for a new showing space in Ashford and
Kent,
attracting new audiences, developing niche audiences
especially among
young people, and inspiring local performing arts
practitioners.
2. The Arts Development Programme - arts activity
and artist commissions that
involves audience in new experiences
and inspires locally-based artists to try
new approaches to their
work and exhibit in St Mary's. This programme will
be led by The
Arts and Arts Development Sub Committee5 and will support
the need
to celebrate the space, the town, its history and its aspirations.
3.
The Community Programme - offering local artists, arts groups
and
community organisations a well-equipped space for knowledge
sharing,
demonstrations, meetings, training, rehearsal,
presentation and performance,
that provides a focus for the local
community to show and celebrate its
achievements.
This approach
provides a robust mechanism for the PCC to make available St
Mary's
and pro-actively develop with a range of partners and communities
the
use of St Mary's as a quality space for spiritual, artistic
and social activity.
Summary of Re-ordering
Below is a summary
of the reordering proposed and the reasons for the works, within
the
context of the needs described above:
* To provide a flexible
auditorium space in the nave of the church, with improved
sightlines,
increased seating capacity and with the capability of
being
reconfigured to host small and large-scale events.
* To
meet the needs of both contemporary church services and
professional
performances by improving the dias and staging
facilities, including provision of
suitable, high quality
lighting, sound and projection systems.
* To provide a suitable
space for arrival and circulation of audiences and the
church
congregation through reconfiguring the present foyer.
* To provide
toilet, kitchen and bar facilities proportionate with the new
capacity
and functions of the venue, and with the expectations of
paying audiences.
* To provide 'backstage' washing and dressing
room facilities suitable for
professional performers and clergy
alike.
* To provide new flexible office and meeting room spaces.
*
To upgrade the present heating and lighting systems creating a
comfortable and
quality showing space.
This project clearly
delivers the key partners, that is the PCC, Ashford Borough
Council,
Ashford's Future, vision and objectives to raise the profile of
Ashford and
sustain growing needs of the
community.
-------------------------------------------------------
1
Appendix C, St Mary's Business Planning Research, sets out an initial
Needs Analysis developed in
consultation with current and
potential user groups and identifies the current technical, capacity
and
resource requirements (Shea Debnam Associates, January
2009).
2 Appendix B, St Mary's Business Planning Research,
provides a review of arts activities that would be
potentially
hosted at St Mary's (Shea Debnam Associates, January 2009).
3
Appendix J, St Mary's Business Planning Research, provides
information on the operational models
deployed by four comparable
Church venues that each share space between religious services, the
arts
and community programmes (Shea Debnam Associates, January
2009).
4
The report First Two Years of Programming explains in more detail the
content of the arts programme
under the three hiring strands (Shea
Debnam Associates, May 2009).
5 The Arts and Arts Development Sub
Committee is defined in a draft Terms of Reference that explores
its
form, functions, composition, selection and management issues (Shea
Debnam Associates,
May
2009)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
An outrage at the Parish Church.
On Saturday 4th June 2005, a "wedding" took place at St
Mary-the-Virgin, Ashford. Never before in the history of that
building has such an irreverent, trite, trivial and mawkish noise
rocked its walls. Outside, drum beats hammered from the once holy
and reverent walls. God was irreverenced: this must never
happen again. It appears that those involved with the wedding
actually hail from a non-conformist Church. That organisation
does a lot of good for the local community - very much that which
the PCC at the Parish Church should do. But the style of supposed
'worship' which took place in the walls of the Parish Church last
Saturday is not what should occur in the Church of England.
Our incomparable Book of Common Prayer (1662), the only true book
of instruction and worship in the Church of England, standing the test
of nearly 350 years (and much despised by the majority of modern
'clergy') instructs that marriage is "not by any to be enterprised or
taken in hand unadvisedly, lightly or wantonly, to satisfy men's carnal
lusts and appetites, like brute beasts that have no understanding, but
reverently discreetly, advisedly, soberly and in the fear of
God". There didn't appear to be any consideration of those facts
by the Bishop of Maidstone, who allowed -indeed welcomed - this wedding.
Nor were the bellringers happy at the late start and length of the
wedding, thus meaning that they wasted an hour waiting in the tower to
ring the bells.
I for my part was kicked off the PCC at the recent Annual Meeting of
the Church because I won't toe the modernising line. This gives
me more chance to use my time profitably to further the cause of 'The
Traditional Church of England in Ashford', which is a pressure group
fighting for the restoration of tradition particularly in the Parish
Church, and against the ideas of the modernisers who want to rip out
the pews and destroy the beautiful interior, dumbing the building
down to their puerile level. All those interested in joining the
fight against this should read the Aims & Objectives.
No doubt my letter will elicit abusive responses from the modernisers
within the congregation of the Parish Church (one of whom threatened to
smack me in the face for expressing my opinions last Saturday).
But these modernisers have been mismanaging the affairs of your Parish
Church for years (usually blaming the previous Vicar, who, in fact,
worked very hard) - and when it runs out of money and has to close
(which will happen unless the Bishops decide to keep it open and
subsidise it with monies raised by other churches; not an unlikely
prospect) you, dear townspeople, will know who to blame.
Christopher J. Cooper
|